Vistana Heights - Fabricated Amended Development Plan

The image below is the as-built-survey drawing of S9 (Lot 15). The green dot is where the driveway is. The figure 32.00 on the 15.24m road is the height of the road in metres which equals to 104.99 feet.

The porch height is shown as 32.38m which is equal to 106.23 feet.

This means the difference in height between the road and the porch is (106.23 - 104.99) 1.24 feet. 

The actual difference on the ground is about 5 feet. 

This is a section of the as-built survey submitted to DBKK to obtain the occupancy certificate. 

 

Below is a photo of the driveway on which I have reversed my car. Any further up and the bumper will break.

A simple estimate of the height of the ramp can be made by counting the number of steps leading up to the letter box. Each step is about half a foot high.

Below is the amended development plan of S9 (Lot 15 above). This may explain why the Arkitek LYS did not respond to my email. I will write a separate article on this.

Compare this with the as-built survey. The platform height (106.26) is about the same (106.23) as the as-built survey. The road height here is 105.00 which is similar to the road height shown on the as-built survey of 104.99.

The argument here, by the architect, perhaps will be that the 105.00 is slightly further up than that on the as-built survey. At this point I don't want to waste my time on such argument.

Now, those who have been following my posts will probably understand why the developer, the consulting engineers, the architect and LPPB do not want to discuss this matter with me. What they don't realise is that sticking their heads in the sand does not prevent others from seeing them. 

All I want is a solution to the problems highlighted in my blog posts but they don't understand the proverb that says 'A stitch in time saves nine'. 小洞不补大洞吃苦.