Luqman's musings

                                           This is a recent photo of the land that collapsed behind                                                   house D18 (Previously numbered S17 & S18).   The Director General’s dismissal during the May 5 and June 11, 2025, meetings, without providing evidence or a formal response, raises questions about transparency and accountability. Writing to him twice without receiving a written reply is concerning, especially given DBKK’s public service mandate. The absence of a formal response could suggest procedural lapses or an unwillingness to engage with public inquiries, which contradicts DBKK’s stated commitment to transparency. 

    Tatal ke bawah untuk melihat terjemahan ke dalam Bahasa Melayu Is the alteration to the house platform height from 101 feet to 106.26 feet, as specified in the sales and purchase agreement (SPA), allowed or legal? The SPA states that "no change or deviation from the approved plans shall be made without the consent in writing of the purchaser."

  During the DBKK (Dewan Bandaraya Kota Kinabalu) meetings held on May 5, 2025, and June 11, 2025, the Director General (DG), summarily dismissed my inquiry regarding whether a retaining wall was mandated in the development plans for Vistana Heights. This raises questions about the basis for his confident assertion that no retaining wall was required in the development plans approved in 2018. How can he be so certain of this claim? Is he implying that the officers and the mayor who approved the 2018 development plan overlooked critical structural requirements or acted negligently?