Posts

Fabricated Evidence in Court Documents: Time to Lodge a Police Report?

Image
  Important Disclaimer: This is a personal blog post about my own ongoing matter and is not legal advice. It reflects my current understanding and should not be taken as guidance for anyone else’s situation. Please seek independent legal advice from a qualified Malaysian lawyer before taking any action. A recent Facebook post highlighted that destroying or fabricating evidence is a criminal offence under Sections 193–204 of the Penal Code . That got me thinking seriously about filing a police report .

A full circle

Image
  Yesterday, a good friend sent me the photo above and said: ‘Notice the elevation?’ I responded: Yes, what is important is if this was according to the DP (Development Plan). He replied: No idea…this has been going on for ages, until they meet LM (Luqman Michel).

Reflection on Timing and Karma

Image
Berikut adalah terjemahan penuh ke Bahasa Melayu When I revisited the events of 2021 in my April 3 post , I wasn’t simply looking backward. I was asking why, years later, the unfairness I experienced still weighed on me enough to write. The answer lies in perspective: with time, patterns become clearer. What felt personal then now looks systemic — the way disciplinary processes can be wielded, and how those who once sat in judgment may themselves face scrutiny.

What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.

Image
  Datuk Roger Chin’s press statement today is powerful: “This is not about rights — it is about whether they will ever be honoured.”   He rightly slams the removal of binding timelines, warning that “complexity” should not become a permanent excuse for delay on Sabah’s 40% entitlement. Here is the full press statement. LINK    Yet in 2021, as Secretary of the Advocates Inquiry Committee, the same logic was not applied.

Even When You Work From the Office, We Get No Replies — So What Happens When You Work From Home, YB Masidi?

Image
  Even when you and other government servants (sorry, masters) work from the office, I don't get replies to emails and letters. Now what can we expect when you work from home? That was my quick reaction to YB Datuk Seri Masidi Manjun ’s recent statement on Sabah’s plan to follow the Federal Government’s Work From Home (WFH) policy .

Why Hasn’t the Legal Profession Act 1976 Been Extended to Sabah?

Image
  A Sabahans’ Perspective on Autonomy, Accountability and Access to Justice In my previous post, I wrote about how ordinary Sabahans — especially those in the B40 group — often find it too costly and discouraging to file complaints against lawyers under our local system. Many readers asked: “If the system feels stacked against ordinary people, why not just extend the Legal Profession Act 1976 (LPA) from Peninsular Malaysia to Sabah so we have one uniform set of rules?” It’s a fair and important question. Let me explain what I’ve learned.

Follow-Up: Making Complaints Against Lawyers Affordable for B40 Sabahans – Why the RM100 Fee Waiver Must Become the Rule, Not the Exception

Image
  In my last post on April 2, I shared how ordinary Sabahans — especially those in the B40 group like myself who rely on RM100 monthly SARA aid — are effectively priced out of complaining about professional misconduct by lawyers. The RM100 processing fee, printing costs, and the feeling that the system is stacked against us make it almost impossible to seek justice.