Case Spotlight: Tong Chen [2011] SGHC 27 — Damages in Deceit
“This is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.” ✍️ Educational Takeaway from this post Even if a defendant is unemployed, the withdrawal of a frivolous counterclaim does not erase the harm suffered. The law recognizes that litigation itself can be a weapon , and damages may be awarded to restore dignity, cover costs, and deter future abuse. 🏛 ️ Case Spotlight: Tong Chen [2011] SGHC 27 — Damages in Deceit Justice Judith Prakash’s decision in Tong Chen is a landmark reminder of how the law treats fraud differently from contract or negligence. The High Court of Singapore drew a sharp line: when deceit is proven, the damages are not about enforcing bargains or compensating careless mistakes — they are about stripping away the harm caused by lies.