Inquiry Regarding Potential Conflict of Interest in Legal Representation

 


The following is my email to the AG's office seeking clarification.

luqman michel 
From:luqmanm2002@yahoo.co.uk
To:sagchambers@sabah.gov.my
Mon 28 Apr at 08:43

Dear Sir,

 

In November 2022, I received correspondence from Messrs. Ronny Cham and Co., claiming to represent Topwira Corporation Sdn Bhd, as well as Puan Rosemary Ahping, General Manager of LPPB, and Puan Della E. Sinidol of LPPB. I sought confirmation from Puan Rosemary and Puan Della regarding whether they authorized Mr. Ronny Cham to act on their behalf, but received no response. LPPB has not clarified whether Mr. Ronny Cham represents the individuals or the organization, leaving his role unclear.


I am considering legal action concerning the alleged fabrication of an as-built survey used to obtain the occupancy certificate for Vistana Heights. Despite multiple requests, neither the developer nor LPPB has agreed to meet to resolve this matter.

 

My concern is whether it is appropriate for Messrs. Ronny Cham and Co. to represent both Topwira Corporation Sdn Bhd and individuals from LPPB, a statutory body. Could this dual representation constitute a conflict of interest? Additionally, does this suggest that the State Attorney General’s Chambers, which typically represents LPPB, is unable to fulfill its duties, or has LPPB independently engaged Mr. Ronny Cham’s services? 

 

I seek clarity to ensure that any court proceedings are based on accurate information and to avoid wasting judicial resources.

 

Thank you for your attention.

 

Yours sincerely,

Luqman Michel
Location: Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bad experience with Sabah architects

Image
The lady in the photo above is 5 feet 2 inches. The as-built survey plan says the height difference between the road height and the house platform height is 1 foot. Are the architects blind? I refer to the views expressed by the Chairman of PAM (Sabah chapter) in Forum on 2.3.2025. The Chairman stated that the Daily Express report on over-certifying projects unfairly generalized architects and risked damaging the reputation of the entire profession.  
Read more

Are architects liable for fabricated documents submitted to authorities

Image
In 2020, many of my well-meaning friends told me that I have no course of action against the professionals involved in obtaining the Occupancy Certificate for Vistana Heights project with fabricated as-built survey plan. I believe all those involved, including DBKK senior officers, LPPB (Lembaga Pembangunan Perumahan Dan Bandar) and its GM Rosemary Ahping, Arkitek LYS, Lembaga Juruukur Sabah etc. will be answerable for how the Occupancy Certificate was issued. Hopefully, my complaint to SPRM (MACC), LJS, DBKK, Lembaga Arkitek Malaysia will be looked into.
Read more

SPRM (MACC) and Vistana Heights

Image
  Someone asked me how the MACC is involved in the Vistana Heights case if I don’t have any proof that corruption is involved. That is an excellent question. We all assume that corruption is only when a bribe is involved. However, a closer look at the brochure from the MACC shows the following:                                                                                                                   Please click on the image above. ...
Read more